THE BOX MOVE
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Profiles
    • Nimra Asi
    • Hassan Bukhari
    • Kamil Ahsan
    • Mehr Un Nisa
    • Maheen Rashid
    • Nayab Abidi
    • Anum Khan
    • Mehdi Mujtaba
    • Haris Baig
    • Syed Ali Raza
    • Abdullah Khalid
  • Essays
    • Biology
    • Physics
    • Mathematics
  • Publication
  • Contact

On Physics Envy

1/23/2013

8 Comments

 
Every discipline in academics acquires its own share of stereotypes and jokes that often satirize its methods or practitioners – mostly in good humor. Equally common are the grievances of various disciplines that lament how the field is either not taken seriously or completely misunderstood by non-experts. The term Physics envy also has such a lighthearted ring to it – making you think it’s a witty reference to a disgruntled Biologist’s inferiority complex. (My Biology major friends have been the victims of such jokes for a while now, so I dare take the liberty yet again)

That is why I was surprised to learn that Physics envy is actually a serious affair that is much debated about and has even been the subject of research as well as books. The term is a somewhat pejorative reference to the presumed attempt of the softer sciences and the social sciences to emulate Physics in their studies in different ways. These include an emphasis on quantitative reasoning, building and using Mathematical models for processes and a tendency towards empirical testing and deductive reasoning as embodied by the broad definition of the scientific method. The tendency has been both a success and a disaster depending on where and when people have tried to employ it. From my own exposure during undergraduate studies, I can mark off areas of Biology such as studies of population growth and epidemics that make remarkably good use of Mathematical modeling. On the other hand, 2008’s financial crisis is often pointed out as a massive failure of quants’ attempts to do Physics with the markets. That is why there is an abundance of both critics and proponents of Physics envy. My aim here is to explore why some methods of the physical sciences may not prove to be as good a tool when extended to other areas of human knowledge.

First let me delve into what could be the possible motivation for being envious of Physics in the first place. There is a vast number of unsolved puzzles and competing theories in Physics; there are also issues of experimental uncertainty when Physicists measure and report values, and then there are fundamental limits placed on certainty by quantum mechanics itself. In spite of these features, Physicists have been immensely successful in understanding and predicting how the universe ought to work, from the sub-atomic to extra-galactic scales. Take, for example, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron which has been calculated up to fourteen significant figures and its experimental measurement agrees with the calculated value to more than ten significant digits.[i] That implies an accuracy of one part in a billion. Such an overwhelming vindication of theory can perhaps inspire people to seek similar predictive power in other fields through mathematical reasoning. In principle, everything we know – from bacteria to human beings or from diseases to democracies – is an aggregate of atoms and forces that we do understand in terms of mathematics; and therefore, we should be able to use similar mathematics to make predictions about those aggregates as well. So, why doesn’t that work?

It doesn’t work because the ‘jump to aggregates’ as suggested above is actually a departure from Physics and not an accurate mimicry of how it works. The whole sometimes works very differently from the parts. In fact, as elegantly described by Lisa Randall, Physics thrives on effective theories with different domains of validity separated by scales.[ii] These scales can be in terms of energies of particles, the distances between them or their speeds. For instance, Newtonian mechanics is an excellent theoretical framework when we’re talking about the scale of planetary orbits (or speeds << c). However, when operating on atomic or sub-atomic scales, it is no longer an effective theory and we’re compelled to look towards quantum mechanics in that domain. Similar is the case on very large scales, when we have to abandon Newton and use General Relativity to understand cosmological dynamics. Furthermore, in Physics, the demarcation between these scales is relatively well understood. We often know exactly when to ignore the contribution from gravity and when not, because we are able to compute the impact of taking it into account for all practical purposes. It is this convenience of distinguishing between scales, that is not available when Physics envy tries to make the transition from the physical to the social universe. We do not yet have an analogue of shifting from Newton to Einstein when we shift from the scale of particles to people, who add an infinite amount of complexity to real world problems. Sure, the behavioral patterns can be studied and regularities can be assumed, but there is a lot that we simply do not know to accurately mimic Physics to discover the fundamental laws of finance – if there are any to begin with. Richard Feynman put it this way while addressing Caltech graduates,

“Imagine how much harder Physics would be if electrons had feelings!”

Another useful idea to understand the problem is how our ability to solve problems changes with what sort of uncertainties are involved. Uncertainties span an entire spectrum or levels as discussed by two MIT professors here. First, there are the completely deterministic systems of classical Physics where you can predict with certainty what value a particular variable would take under given conditions; then there are systems with probability distributions where your ability to predict is reduced to confidence intervals; then there are levels where in the absence of any probability distributions you’re forced to rely on gathering data, using Bayesian methods and making statistical inferences. The uncertainties progressively build up to levels where no amount of data or stochastic modeling is sufficient to make any reliable predictions. [iii]Problems involving humans are mostly uncertain to that extent and therefore forcing upon them a mathematical model that is only appropriate for much lesser levels of uncertainty, is wrong. As Emanuel Derman - a theoretical Physicist turned financial engineer – says,

“Whenever we make a model of something involving human beings, we are trying to force the ugly stepsister’s foot into Cinderella’s pretty glass slipper. It doesn't fit without cutting off some essential parts. And in cutting off parts for the sake of beauty and precision, models inevitably mask the true risk rather than exposing it.”[iv]

This also exposes the flaw of forced quantitative analysis in some situations. The power of quantifying an idea is undoubtedly amazing as it makes your claims precise and testable. However, when pushed in the face of uncertainties, a number can be more misleading than helpful. This is because the number of assumptions that go into arriving at that single quantity can completely distort reality. For example, imagine trying to assign a single number – let’s call it People’s coefficient - to describe the potential of a political movement to bring about revolution. It will be very surprising if that made sense because there are so many dynamics of the individual and collective actions of people  that are simply too complicated to fit an arbitrary mathematical description. In fact, Physics envy can prove to be embarrassingly dangerous in such circumstances, as exemplified by the famous prank of Alan Sokal.

In the end – in my humble opinion - there is one area where an emulation of the hard sciences is justified and that is empirical testing. Every theory – whether it is arrived at through Maths or dialectics – should be subjected to some kind of validating procedure that opens it to falsification. After all, it is empirical evidence that separates a valid theory from mere opinion or speculation. Of course, it is not possible to test every possible theory experimentally at a given time in history, and that should not be a reason for scientists to constrain their imaginations in any way. However, it is probably also not a good idea to prefer explanatory power or elegance over predictive power and empirical verification – especially when the theory or model in question is going to be used to make decisions that impact lives.


[i] Rym Bouchendira1, P. C.-K. (2011). New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant and Test of the Quantum Electrodynamics. Physical Review Letters , 080801


[ii] Randall, L. (2011). Knocking on Heaven's Door. HarperCollins.


[iii]Lo, A.W., Mueller, M.T. (2010). Warning: Physics Envy may be hazardous to your wealth


[iv] Emanuel Derman’s Blog


Mehr.
8 Comments
    The Box Move blog is no longer active since the founding team has graduated. The archives will remain online.


    RSS Feed


    AFFILIATES:
    Picture
    The SPROJ Forum for the SSE 2012 batch. Discuss potential Senior Projects here.

    Picture
    Brain Talk is an online resource and forum for all things Psychology and Neuroscience.


    Picture

    MUSIC FOR GEEKS:
    Featured: Art Tatum Three Letter Word

    Like us on Facebook!


    ON THE FRINGE:

    Picture
    Learn something
    The story of a how a YouTube video of a blind man biking down a mountain inspired good non-fiction writing on echolocation. You may find it useful for your own writing. Read here.

    Picture
    An awful waste of space?
    Amidst NASA's budgetary cuts and scientists' renewed vigor in justifying Space Programs, it is important to shed some light on the background. Click here for a succinct overview of the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence(SETI) project.
    Picture
    Manto ka Muqaddama
    Pakistaniat.com publishes, on the anniversary of Saadat Hasan Manto's death, a sampling of his works, a tribute to him as well as articles chronicling the obscenity trial he was tried for. Read all three parts of the series here.
    Picture
    Not Another 2010 List
    The folks over at The Last Word put up their list for the best non-fiction in the past year, including 'The Mind's Eye' which is very hard to find in bookstores, indeed! Read the full list here.
    Picture
    Bird Conspiracies
    Leslie Kaufman at The New York Times tells us exactly why those birds flying above are dropping to their deaths. Click here to read the article.
    Picture
    Spontaneous Solar Growth!
    Reported at MadScience, scientists at MIT have found a way to create solar cells that can regenerate themselves like living organisms. Read more here. 
    Picture
    Lessons from Chernobyl
    Decades after the radiation disaster at Chernobyl, scientists elucidate how plant life has been thriving in the highly radioactive environment. Read more here.
    Picture
    Rolling Ribbons
    MIT Scientists revisit Galileo's famous inclined plane experiment, this time with polymer ribbons and discover complex results. Read here.
    Picture
    A Lifetime, Washed Away
    Pakistani author Daniyal Mueenuddin writes in the NY Times about the aftermath of the flood and displaced people. Read more here of the article posted by 3QD.
    Picture
    On String theory and Materials Science
    Click here to find out how physicists at MIT are using ideas of gauge/gravity duality to explain properties of superconductors.
    Picture
    That's why you're irrational!
    Newsweek's Sharon Begley provides a fascinating argument for why evolution may favor irrationality. I particularly liked the examples she picked. Read
    here.
    Picture
    Just when you wanted a gene kit
    The US Food and Drug Administration held hearings n the 19th and 20th of July to talk about the validity of tests which were sold directly to the public which gives consumers direct access to to their genomes. Should it be regulated? Read more here.
    Picture
    On Trees and Prisons
    In a 6 minute talk on Ted.com, Nalini Nadkarni (shown above) talks about her ideas of incorporating conservation into prison programs. Watch the talk and read Nadkarni's fascinating biography here.
    Picture
    These Lungs are made in USA
    Stem Cell Biology takes huge leaps forward with the new advances made in lung transplants based on using the lungs extracellular architecture. Read more from Nature here.
    Picture
    Economist Special Reports
    Ten years after Craig Venter revealed the first working draft of the entire Human Genome, this special report demonstrates how Biology is now at the brink of something brilliant - just recently, the draft of the entire genome of the Neanderthal was revealed. Suck on that, sceptics!
    Picture
    Orbit Stories
    Bobby Satcher, astronaut, the first orthopedic surgeon in space. Read all about his tales here on MITnews.
    Picture
    Craig Venter Creations
    Researchers create world's first fully synthetic self replicating, living cell. Massive fuss about limitless monster potential possible. Read the NewScientist article here. Watch the Ted.com talk by Craig Venter here.



    TAGS

    All
    3d
    500 Days Of Summer
    Abdus Salam
    Ageing
    Alan Turing
    Albert Einstein
    Aldous Huxley
    Algorithms
    Altruism
    A Mathematician\'s Lament
    Andrew Marvell
    Anfinsen\'s Experiment
    Angelina Jolie
    Angiogenesis
    Artificial Intelligence
    Atomic Bomb
    Autosomal Dominant
    Ayn Rand
    Baluchistan
    Barack Obama
    Bats
    Battlestar Galactica
    Beta Pictoris B
    Billie Holliday
    Biotechnology
    Bioterrorism
    Birthday
    Black Holes
    Blasphemy
    Blue-Footed Boobies
    Brian Greene
    Cancer
    Carl Sagan
    Cern
    Chaos Theory
    Chemistry
    Citizen Science
    Citrus Greening
    Climate Change
    Clinical Trials
    Cloud Computing
    Computer Viruses
    Computer Vision
    Comsats
    Copenhagen Summit
    Coping
    Creamed Spinach
    Creationism
    Cs101
    Cults
    Dark Matter
    Darwin
    Debating
    Deduction
    Delauney Graphs
    Democracy
    Depth Sensing
    Die Grunen
    Discrete Geometry
    Dna
    Dna Barcodes
    Dr. Abu Bakr Muhammad
    Dr. Asad Naqvi
    Dr. Sabieh Anwar
    Dr. Shahid Khan
    Dublin
    Edge Detection
    Education
    Education In Pakistan
    Ella Fitzgerald
    Emile Zola
    Energy Crisis
    Engels
    Enhancers
    Entropy
    Enzyme Kinetics
    Epigenetics
    Ernst Haeckel
    Espresso Taster
    Evo-devo
    Evolution
    Facebook
    Fairytale
    Faiz
    Feynman
    First-order Differential Equations
    Flood
    Fm Phone Transmitter
    Fourier Transforms
    Fractals
    Francis Bacon
    Freshmen
    Freud
    Fruit Flies
    Gadgets
    Gannets
    Gender
    Gene Clustering
    Genetic Engineering
    Genetics
    Google
    Graduate School
    Graph Generators
    Guinea Worm Disease
    Hadron Collider
    History
    Human Epigenome Project
    Humanities
    Hyposmia
    Image Processing
    Induction
    Inherit The Wind
    Insulin
    Invisibility Cloak
    Ipcc
    Isabel Allende
    Jacob Bronowski
    James Watson
    Jorge Luis Borges
    Journalism
    Kelly Clarkson
    Kinect
    Kings Of Convenience
    K-means
    Lisa Randall
    Lois Mcmaster
    Longevity
    Lorentz System
    Malaria
    Manhattan Project
    Marfan\'s
    Markov Chains
    Marx
    Mathematical Biology
    Mathematical Proofs
    Mathematics
    Matlab
    Media
    Mendel
    Meta-Consciousness
    Meta-flex
    Michio Kaku
    Miles Davis
    Mitochondria
    Mmr Vaccine Controversy
    Model United Nations
    Motion Detection
    Mozart
    Mri
    Multidrug Resistance
    Muons
    Music
    Musings
    Muslim World
    Nasa
    Nathiagali
    Nazca Boobies
    Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Neuroscience
    Noise
    Nuclear Fission
    One Laptop Per Child
    Optical Dispersion
    Owl City
    Paul Lockhart
    Penelope Cruz
    Penrose Stairs
    Pervaiz Hoodbhoy
    Photography
    Photolyase
    Photosynthesis
    Phrenology
    Physics
    Physics Envy
    Pineapple Chicken
    Pink Floyd
    Planet Hunting
    Pleasure Science
    Poetry
    Population Demographic Collection
    Positive Feedback
    Prions
    Processors
    Prolog
    Psi Fi 2010
    Psi-Fi 2010
    Psychology
    Psyllids
    Publication
    Quantum Physics
    Quarks
    Ramachandran Plots
    Recipes
    Recursion
    Redundancy
    Regulons
    Relief Efforts
    Religious Minorities
    Richard Dawkins
    Richard Feynman
    Rna
    Rna Interference
    Robert Frost
    Robotics
    Roger Penrose
    Role Playing
    Romanticism
    Romeo And Juliet
    Rudyard Kipling
    Rugby
    Scientific Journals
    Scopes Trial
    Self Assembly
    Self-assembly
    Semester Finals
    Senior Projects
    Sentiment Analysis
    Sherlock Holmes
    Signals And Systems
    Single View Reconstructions
    Sir Edward Dyer
    Slaughterhouse-Five
    Snow Leopard
    Sokal Affair
    Sse
    Stalin
    Stephen Hall
    Stephen Hawking
    Stephen Jay Gould
    Stephen Pinker
    Stress
    Superpowers
    Symmetry
    Systems Biology
    Taipei
    Taste
    Ted
    Telomeres
    The Butterfly Effect
    The Doors
    T.H. Huxley
    Third Eye Blind
    Thomas Nigel
    Time Traveling
    Tony Judt
    Topic Analysis
    Tracking Devices
    Transmitter Circuits
    Transposable Elements
    Turing Test
    Twilight
    Twistor Theory
    Ulysses
    Valentine\'s Day
    Vocational Training
    William Paley
    Women
    World Cup
    World Of Warcraft
    Wwf
    Zaid Hamid
    Zardari
    Zoo


    FEEDS:

    ARCHIVES

    January 2013
    August 2012
    June 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.